Quick Navigation
Section 102 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
102. On whom burden of proof lies
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.
Illustrations
(a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, Bs father
If no evidence were given on either side, B would b entitled to retain his possession.
Therefore the burden of proof is on A.
(b) A sues B for money due on a bond.
The execution of the bond is admitted, by B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies.
If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved.
Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
Related Sections
- Section 86: Presumption as to certified copies of foreign judicial records
- Section 103: Burden of proof as to particular fact
- Section 27: How much of information received from accused may be proved
- Section 3: Interpretation clause
- Section 19: Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit
Related Acts
* Only for reference.