Quick Navigation
Section 102 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
102. On whom burden of proof lies
The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side.
Illustrations
(a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, Bs father
If no evidence were given on either side, B would b entitled to retain his possession.
Therefore the burden of proof is on A.
(b) A sues B for money due on a bond.
The execution of the bond is admitted, by B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies.
If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved.
Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
Related Sections
- Section 91: Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document
- Section 161: Right of adverse party as to writing used to refresh memory
- Section 49: Opinion as to usage, tenets, etc., when relevant
- Section 74: Public documents
- Section 67A: Proof as to digital signature
Related Acts
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017
- Collection of Statistics (Amendment) Act, 2017
- Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Teachers Cadre) Act, 2019
- Repealing and Amending Act, 2015
- Prohibition of Electronic Cigarettes (Production, Manufacture, Import, Export, Transport, Sale, Distribution, Storage and Advertisement) Act, 2019
* Only for reference.