LawFinder detail

Section 19 - Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit | Indian Evidence Act, 1872 vs The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 | LawFinder

Review the source section and mapped section together, capture notes, and move between related laws, charts, and activity tools without leaving the comparison flow.

Select a section to open the side-by-side comparison.

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 19The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Section 17

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 19

Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit

Open law page

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

19. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit

Statements made by persons whose position or liability it is necessary to prove as against any party to the suit are admissions, if such statements would be relevant as against such persons in relation to such position or liability in a suit brought by or against them, and if they are made whilst the person making them occupies such position or is subject to such liability.

Illustration

A undertakes to collect rents for B.

B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B.

A denies that rent was due from C to B.

A statement by C that he owned B rent is an admission, and is a relevant fact as against A, if A denies that C did owe rent to B.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 17

Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit

Open law page

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

17. Admissions by persons whose position must be proved as against party to suit.

Statements made by persons whose position or liability, it is necessary to prove as against any party to the suit, are admissions, if such statements would be relevant as against such persons in relation to such position or liability in a suit brought by or against them, and if they are made whilst the person making them occupies such position or is subject to such liability.

Illustration.

A undertakes to collect rents for B. B sues A for not collecting rent due from C to B. A denies that rent was due from C to B. A statement by C that he owed B rent is an admission, and is a relevant fact as against A, if A denies that C did owe rent to B.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

Mapping note

Editor note for this section pair

Open in chart view

No editorial note has been attached to this mapping yet.