LawFinder detail

Section 22 - When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant | Indian Evidence Act, 1872 vs The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 | LawFinder

Review the source section and mapped section together, capture notes, and move between related laws, charts, and activity tools without leaving the comparison flow.

Select a section to open the side-by-side comparison.

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 22The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Section 20

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 22

When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

Open law page

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

22. When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

Oral admissions as to the contents of a documents are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules herein after contained, or unless the geniuses of a document produced is in question.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 20

When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant

Open law page

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

20. When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant.

Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

Mapping note

Editor note for this section pair

Open in chart view

No editorial note has been attached to this mapping yet.