LawFinder detail

Section 40 - Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial | Indian Evidence Act, 1872 vs The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 | LawFinder

Review the source section and mapped section together, capture notes, and move between related laws, charts, and activity tools without leaving the comparison flow.

Select a section to open the side-by-side comparison.

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 40The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Section 34

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 40

Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial

Open law page
Indian Evidence Act, 1872

40. Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial

The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Courts from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit, or to hold such trial.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 34

Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial

Open law page
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Judgments of Courts when relevant

34. Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.

The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

Mapping note

Editor note for this section pair

Open in chart view

No editorial note has been attached to this mapping yet.