LawFinder detail

Section 42 - Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41 | Indian Evidence Act, 1872 vs The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 | LawFinder

Review the source section and mapped section together, capture notes, and move between related laws, charts, and activity tools without leaving the comparison flow.

Select a section to open the side-by-side comparison.

Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 42The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 Section 36

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Section 42

Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41

Open law page
Indian Evidence Act, 1872

42. Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 41

Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 41, are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry; but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state.

Illustration

A Sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the land, which A denies

The existence of a decree in favor of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land, in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists

0views

Section notes

Loading...

The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

Section 36

Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35

Open law page
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023

36. Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35.

Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 35 are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry; but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state.

Illustration.

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence of a public right of way over the land, which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land, in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists.

0views

Section notes

Loading...

Mapping note

Editor note for this section pair

Open in chart view

No editorial note has been attached to this mapping yet.