Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah vs Kamal Dayani
The case revolves around a contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of a prior court order regarding anticipatory bail. The petitioner had been accused in an FIR related to a financial transaction and sought anticipatory bail, which was initially denied by the Sessions Court and the High Court. The petitioner was subsequently arrested and claimed to have been illegally detained for nearly 48 hours.
Case Notes
Anticipatory Bail
48. Criminal jurisprudence requires that the liberty of an individual should not be curtailed without sufficient cause. The law of anticipatory bail i...
Read moreAnticipatory Bail
58. Thus, the power to grant anticipatory bail is not to be exercised in a routine manner and the Courts are expected to use this provision with a gre...
Read moreAnticipatory Bail
<strong>Limitations on Investigating Agency:</strong> An order of anticipatory bail does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or...
Read morePublisher: Supreme Court of India
Citation No: 2024 INSC 588
Category: Criminal Law
Tags: 2024 INSC, 2024 INSC August, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Criminal Procedure Code