2024 INSC 588 Criminal Law 3 case notes

Judgement detail

Tusharbhai Rajnikantbhai Shah vs Kamal Dayani

The case revolves around a contempt petition filed by the petitioner alleging willful disobedience of a prior court order regarding anticipatory bail. The petitioner had been accused in an FIR related to a financial transaction and sought anticipatory bail, which was initially denied by the Sessions Court and the High Court. The petitioner was subsequently arrested and claimed to have been illegally detained for nearly 48 hours.

Published by
Supreme Court of India
Category
Criminal Law
Tags
2024 INSC, 2024 INSC August, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, Criminal Procedure Code
Citation
2024 INSC 588

Related notes

Case notes linked to this judgement

3

Anticipatory Bail

48. Criminal jurisprudence requires that the liberty of an individual should not be curtailed without sufficient cause. The law of anticipatory bail is a safeguard against the a...

Read note

Anticipatory Bail

58. Thus, the power to grant anticipatory bail is not to be exercised in a routine manner and the Courts are expected to use this provision with a great degree of circumspection...

Read note

Anticipatory Bail

Limitations on Investigating Agency: An order of anticipatory bail does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigating agency, to invest...

Read note