Quick Navigation
Section 27 - The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
27. Relevancy of certain evidence for proving, in subsequent proceeding, truth of facts therein stated.
Evidence given by a witness in a judicial proceeding, or before any person authorised by law to take it, is relevant for the purpose of proving, in a subsequent judicial proceeding, or in a later stage of the same judicial proceeding, the truth of the facts which it states, when the witness is dead or cannot be found, or is incapable of giving evidence, or is kept out of the way by the adverse party, or if his presence cannot be obtained without an amount of delay or expense which, under the circumstances of the case, the Court considers unreasonable:
Provided that the proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest; that the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine and the questions in issue were substantially the same in the first as in the second proceeding.
Explanation.-A criminal trial or inquiry shall be deemed to be a proceeding between the prosecutor and the accused within the meaning of this section. Statements made under special circumstances
Related Sections
- Section 46: In civil cases character to prove conduct imputed, irrelevant
- Section 91: Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced
- Section 70: Proof when Attesting witness denies execution
- Section 129: Evidence as to affairs of State
- Section 37: Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 when relevant
Related Acts
- Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Act, 2019
- National Commission for Backward Classes (Repeal) Act, 2018
- Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016
- National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (Amendment) Act, 2017
- National Council for Teacher Education (Amendment) Act, 2019